Blog

As Canada continues to debate whether euthanasia should be extended to people suffering solely from mental illness, prominent psychiatrists are warning lawmakers that the fundamental clinical and ethical concerns behind previous delays have still not been resolved.

The issue has returned to national attention following a legal challenge by Toronto woman Claire Elyse Brosseau, who is seeking a court exemption to access Medical Assistance in Dying (MAID) despite mental illness currently remaining excluded under Canadian law.

Brosseau, who has bipolar disorder and PTSD, argues that she has exhausted all available treatment options and should have the same access to assisted dying as patients with physical illnesses. Canada is currently scheduled to expand MAID eligibility to psychiatric illness in 2027 after delaying implementation twice.

However, during recent hearings before Canada’s Special Joint Committee on Medical Assistance in Dying (AMAD), senior psychiatrists warned that the medical profession is still unable to safely make many of the assessments such an expansion would require.

Dr Sonu Gaind, professor of psychiatry at the University of Toronto and former president of the Canadian Psychiatric Association, told the parliamentary committee that “none of those issues have been resolved” since the government first paused the expansion. He warned that assessors still cannot reliably predict whether mental illness is truly irremediable or distinguish suicidality from a settled wish to die.

Gaind also raised concerns that existing MAID reporting systems fail to adequately track suicide risk factors and psychosocial drivers behind requests for assisted death. In his testimony, he pointed specifically to loneliness, isolation, hopelessness, and feelings of being a burden, all recognised suicide risk factors, which he said are already appearing frequently in non-terminal MAID cases.

These concerns are especially significant for psychiatrists and legal professionals because they strike at the heart of capacity assessment and informed consent.

Unlike many terminal physical illnesses, psychiatric conditions often fluctuate over time, and prognoses remain highly uncertain. Critics of expansion argue that there is currently no objective clinical standard capable of determining when a mental illness has become permanently untreatable.

Canada’s own federally commissioned Expert Panel on MAID and Mental Illness acknowledged these challenges in its 2022 report, identifying major concerns surrounding incurability, suicidality, decision-making capacity, and structural vulnerability.

The Canadian debate has also intensified following evidence from oversight reviews showing that some patients requesting MAID cited social isolation, housing insecurity, or fear of being a burden as contributing factors in their suffering.

For many clinicians, this raises a profound question: can a healthcare system safely offer euthanasia for mental illness while simultaneously struggling to provide adequate psychiatric care, addiction treatment, disability support, and suicide prevention services?

Canada’s parliamentary committee is expected to report later this year on whether the country should proceed with the planned expansion.

For doctors observing the debate internationally, the evidence emerging from Canada increasingly suggests that the clinical uncertainties surrounding MAID and mental illness are far from settled.

Sources: BBC, CBC News, Parliament of Canada Committee Evidence, Health Canada, Associated Press, The Guardian